HARRIS v. D'ILIO et al

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that respondent shall reserve its response to petitioner's habeas petition on petitioner within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order and respondent shall file a certificate of service in this Court w ith respect to the re-service of its response; and it is further ORDERED that petitioner may file a reply to respondent's response within forty-five (45) days of the date of the re-service of respondent's response. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 8/5/2016. (seb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
JAROD HARRIS,
Petitioner,

Civ. No. 15-1603 (KM)

V.

STEPHEN D’ILIO,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Respondent.

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§

2254. On July 23, 2015, respondent filed a response to the habeas

petition. The response included a certificate of service. Petitioner did not file a reply.
Almost one year after respondent filed a response to the habeas petition or on July 22,
2016, this Court received a letter from petitioner indicating that he never received a copy of the
response to his habeas petition. (See Dkt. No. 15) In the interest ofjustice, this Court will order
respondent to again serve its response on petitioner and will allow petitioner time to file a reply
to the response if he elects to do so.
Accordingly, IT IS this 5th day of August, 2016,
ORDERED that respondent shall reserve its response to petitioner’s habeas petition on
petitioner within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order and respondent shall file a
certificate of service in this Court with respect to the re-service of its response; and it is further
ORDERED that petitioner may file a reply to respondent’s response within forty-five
(45) days of the date of the re-service of respondent’s response; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Order on petitioner by regular U.S. mail.

/%J

KEWN MtifTY
United States District Judge

2

1’)