SKOBLAR v. ULTO

Filing 24

LETTER ORDER Accordingly, the Court Denies Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Default Judgment, and orders Plaintiff to refile the motion for default judgment within thirty days of the date of this letter Order, etc. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 8/19/2016. (JB, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CHAMBERS OF MARTIN LUTHER KING COURTHOUSE 50 WALNUT ST. ROOM 5076 NEWARK, NJ 07101 973-297-4887 ESTHER SALAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE August 19, 2016 LETTER ORDER Re: Skoblar v. Ulto Civil Action No. 15-6069 (ES) (JAD) Dear Counsel: On July 19, 2016, the Clerk of Court entered default against Defendant Melissa Ulto. (D.E. dated 07/19/2016). On July 20, 2016, the Court issued a Letter Order outlining the factors Plaintiff should address in a motion for default judgment. (D.E. No. 21). On August 18, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. (D.E. No. 23). However, the motion did not comport with the Court’s July 20, 2016 Letter Order—the five-page brief in support of the motion only presented argument as to service, whether a sufficient cause of action was stated, and damages. In short, Plaintiff’s submission does not address the factors the Court ordered Plaintiff to address in the Court’s July 20, 2016 Letter Order. (D.E. No. 21). Accordingly, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, (D.E. No. 23), and orders Plaintiff to refile the motion for default judgment within thirty days of the date of this Letter Order. The refiled motion for default judgment shall include a letter-brief (no more than seven pages) that specifically addresses the factors outlined in the Court’s July 20, 2016 Letter Order. In addition to the letter brief, Plaintiff may submit any documentation and certifications in support of the motion. SO ORDERED. s/Esther Salas Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?