KAYE v. REEVES et al
LETTER ORDER: ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 36 Report and Recommendations. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint is DENIED without prejudice with leave to refile. The Clerk is directed to terminate docket entries 34 and 36, etc. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 4/5/17. (cm, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
MARTIN LUTHER KING
50 WALNUT ST.
NEWARK, NJ 07101
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
April 6, 2017
Kaye v. Reeves, et al.
Civil Action No. 15-6332 (ES) (MAH)
Pending before this Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand this matter to New Jersey
Superior Court in Essex County. (D.E. No. 34). On October 3, 2016, Defendants opposed
Plaintiff’s motion and, in the same brief, moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. (D.E. No. 35).
On December 12, 2016, the Honorable Michael A. Hammer, U.S.M.J., issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this Court deny Plaintiff’s motion. (D.E. No. 36).
Magistrate Judge Hammer advised the parties that they had until December 27, 2016 to file and
serve any objections to the R&R pursuant to L. Civ. R. 72.1(c)(2). To date, parties have not filed
The Court has considered the parties’ submissions, as well as Magistrate Judge Hammer’s
R&R, and for the reasons stated therein,
IT IS on this 5th day of April 2017,
ORDERED that this Court adopts Magistrate Judge Hammer’s R&R in full; and it is
ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint is DENIED without
prejudice with leave to refile; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate docket entries 34 and 36.
Esther Salas, U.S.D.J
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?