KING v. GREEN
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER administratively terminating this action; if petitioner wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify the Court within thirty (30) days after the date of entry of this Order, in writing; the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order and a blank form application proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 12/14/2015. (nr, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
PAUL GREGORY KING,
Civ. No. 15-85 19 (KM)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Petitioner, Paul Gregory King, is an immigration detainee currently lodged at the Essex
County Correctional Facility in Newark, New Jersey. He is proceeding pro se with a petition for
writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
which challenged his continued immigration
detention. The petition did not include an application to proceed in jormapauperis nor did it
include payment of the $5.00 filing fee. Thus this case will be administratively closed. Mr. King
shall be given an opportunity to reopen this action, should he so choose, by submitting the fee or
a completed informapauperis application.
Accordingly, IT IS this 14th day of December, 2015,
ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this case for petitioner’s
failure to either pay the requisite filing fee of $5.00 or to submit a complete application to
proceed informapaztperis; and it is further
ORDERED that if petitioner wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify the Court
within thirty (30) days after the date of entry of this Order, in writing. Petitioner’s written
notification shall include either: (1) a complete informapauperis application, including a
certified statement of petitioner’s institutional account as required by Local Civil Rule 81.2(b);
or (2) the $5.00 filing fee; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order and a blank form application to
proceed informapauperis by a prisoner in a habeas corpus case on petitioner by regular U.S.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?