TIGGS v. JOHNSON et al
MEMORANDUM/ORDER that respondent shall re-serve Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 10, 32 and 33 to its answer to the habeas petition within ten (10) days of the date of this Order;that petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date he is re-servedwith these exhibits in which to file a reply in further support of his habeas petition. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 4/18/16. (DD, ) N/M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I)ISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
ARTHUR L. TIGGS,
Civ. No. 15-8664 (KM)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Petitioner, Arthur L. Tiggs, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254. On March 18, 2016, respondent filed an answer to
the habeas petition. However, on April 14, 2016, this Court received a letter from Mr. Tiggs in
which he states that he did not receive several of the exhibits that respondent attached to the
answer. ‘Therefore, in the interest ofjustice, respondent shall be ordered to re-serve these exhibits
on Mr. Tiggs.
Accordingly, IT IS this 18th day of April, 2016,
ORDERED that respondent shall re-serve Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 10, 32 and 33 to its answer to
the habeas petition within ten (10) days of the date of this Order; and it is further
ORDERED that petitioner shall have ibrty-five (45) days from the date he is re-served
with these exhibits in which to file a reply in further support of his habeas petition, if he elects to
do so; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Order on petitioner by regular U.S. mail.
JL /‘QL-KEV[N MCNULTY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?