TIGGS v. JOHNSON et al

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM/ORDER that respondent shall re-serve Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 10, 32 and 33 to its answer to the habeas petition within ten (10) days of the date of this Order;that petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date he is re-servedwith these exhibits in which to file a reply in further support of his habeas petition. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 4/18/16. (DD, ) N/M

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I)ISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ARTHUR L. TIGGS, Petitioner, Civ. No. 15-8664 (KM) V. STEVEN JOHNSON, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Respondent. Petitioner, Arthur L. Tiggs, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 18, 2016, respondent filed an answer to the habeas petition. However, on April 14, 2016, this Court received a letter from Mr. Tiggs in which he states that he did not receive several of the exhibits that respondent attached to the answer. ‘Therefore, in the interest ofjustice, respondent shall be ordered to re-serve these exhibits on Mr. Tiggs. Accordingly, IT IS this 18th day of April, 2016, ORDERED that respondent shall re-serve Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 10, 32 and 33 to its answer to the habeas petition within ten (10) days of the date of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that petitioner shall have ibrty-five (45) days from the date he is re-served with these exhibits in which to file a reply in further support of his habeas petition, if he elects to do so; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Order on petitioner by regular U.S. mail. JL /‘QL-KEV[N MCNULTY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?