UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $3,045,783.91, COMPRISED OF: et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting 8 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 8/15/16. (gh, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Civ. No. 2:16-01294 (WJM)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

$3,045,783.91, COMPRISED OF:, et al.,
Defendants.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Government’s (“Plaintiff’s”)
motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 1, 2016 Order denying Plaintiff’s motion
for default judgment against $3,045,783.91 of United States currency, comprised of
various amounts of money from several bank accounts held in the name of RA’s
Merchandise, LLC and belonging to Arlene and James Platterborze (“the Currency”).
For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED.
A motion for reconsideration may be granted only if: (1) there has been an
intervening change in the controlling law; (2) new evidence has become available since
the Court decided the subject motion; or (3) it is necessary to correct a clear error of law
or fact or to prevent manifest injustice. U.S. ex rel. Schumann v. Astrazeneca Pharm.
L.P., 769 F.3d 837, 848–49 (3d Cir. 2014) (internal citations omitted).
Here, reconsideration is warranted because new evidence has become available
since the Court entered its July 2016 Order: the Claimant, Arlene Platterborze has filed a
signed declaration with this Court, dated August 1, 2016, confirming that she and her
1

husband waive any interest they may have in the Currency. ECF doc. 11-1. Arlene
Platterborze’s counsel further states that her client does not object to the entry of default
judgment. ECF doc. 11. Because the Court can now “ensure that there [is] a basis for the
damages specified in the default judgment,” United States v. $24,700 in U.S. Currency,
2015 WL 4647978 at *2 (D.N.J. Aug. 5, 2015) (citing Transatlantic Marine Claims
Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp., 109 F.3d 105, 111 (2d Cir. 1997)), and that civil
forfeiture is warranted, default judgment is proper.

See, e.g., United States v.

$156,000,000 in United States Currency Belonging To Credit Agricole Corp. & Inv.
Bank, No. 15-cv-1732, 2016 WL 659670, at *1 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, 2016) (finding default
judgment appropriate where potential claimant expressly agreed not to contest the civil
forfeiture action).
Consequently,
IT IS on this 15th day of August 2016, hereby,
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. Default
judgment will be entered against the Currency in a separate judgment.

/s/ William J. Martini

WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.

2