UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $54,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY

Filing 10

ORDER granting Plaintiff 's 7 Motion for Default Judgment and a Final Order of Forfeiture against the Defendant property, etc. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 06/06/2017. (ek)

Download PDF
1OlVO832,[WGfgr WILLIAM E. FITZPATRICK Acting United States Attorney By: Peter W, Gaeta Assistant United States Attorney 970 Broad Street, Suite 700 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Tel: 973645.2927 Fax: 973297.2042 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Hon. Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J. Civil Action. No, 16-2075 (SDW) DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE $54,76000 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY Defendant in rem. WHEREAS, on or about August 27, 2015, the US. Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) seized $54,76000 in United States currency, from carry-on luggage belonging to Lionel Manigault at Terminal C, Gate 131 at Newark Liberty International Airport in Elizabeth, New Jersey (the ‘defendant property); WHEREAS, on or about January 15, 2016, the DEA received an administrative claim from Lionel Manigault through his counsel Erica C. Mirabella, Esq; WHEREAS, on April 14, 2016, the United States commenced a civil judicial action for the forfeiture of the defendant property by filing a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (the “Verified Complaint”). (ECF No.1); WHEREAS the Verified Complaint alleges that the defendant property is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), because it constitutes money furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance or represents proceeds traceable to an exchange for a controlled substance, a violation of the Controlled Substances Act, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 801, et seq.; WHEREAS on or about April 20, 2016, the United States filed with this Court a Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (the “Notice of Complaint”) (ECF No.3) and sent copies of the Verified Complaint and the Notice of Complaint, by certified mail return receipt requested, to Erica C. Mirabella, Esq. in her capacity as counsel to Lionel Manigault. (See Declaration of Peter Gaeta with Exhibits, hereinafter “Gaeta Dcci.” at Exhibit A, filed herein>; WHEREAS the Notice of Complaint stated that any person who wished to assert an interest in and avoid forfeiture of the defendant property must file a conforming Claim with the Clerk of the Court no later than thirty-five (35) days from the date of mailing of direct notice or the date of delivery, if personally served (i.e. May 25, 2016), or, if direct notice was not sent to the claimant or the claimant’s attorney, no later than 60 days after the first day of publication on an official irternet government forfeiture site. In addition, the Notice of Complaint also detailed the procedure for filing a claim and answer while stating that failure to timely file a conforming Claim, or failure to file an Answer or Motion, would result in the United States seeking judgment by default for the relief demanded in the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem.; WHEREAS, the United States posted notice of this forfeiture action on an official government internet site, namely www.forfeiture. gov, beginning on April 21, 2016, and running for thirty consecutive days, through May 20, 2016, as permitted by Rule O(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Supplemental Rules”). Proof of publication was flied with the Court on or about May 2, 2017; WHEREAS, on or about April 24, 2016, copies of the Verified Complaint, and Notice of Complaint were delivered to the office of Erica C. Mirabella, Esq., Mirabella Law, LLC, as counsel for potential claimant Lionel Manigault, which is located at 132 Boviston Street, 5th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts, 02116. (Gaeta Dccl. at Exhibit A); and WHEREAS no conforming Claim and/or Answer has been filed within the time required by Rule G(5)(a) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(4)(A) for the defendant property. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That a Default Judgment and a Final Order of Forfeiture is granted against the defendant property, namely $54,76OOO in United States currency, and no right, title or interest in the defendant property shall exist in any other party; and 2. That any and all forfeited funds, including but not limited to currency, currency equivalents and certificates of deposits, as well as any income derived as a result of the United States Marshals Service’s management of any property forfeited herein, after the payment of costs and expenses incurred in connection with the forfeiture and disposition of the forfeited property, shall be deposited forthwith by the United States Marshals Service into the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund, in accordance with the law, The Clerk is hereb directed ORDERED this counsel of record. day of 17 JUDGE 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?