DORSEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MEMORANDUM/ORDER that respondents request that this Court supply petitioner with the Miller notices (Dkt. No. 6) is denied as unnecessary. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 9/8/16. (DD, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Civ. No. 16-2294 (KM)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence
pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255. On September 2, 2016, this Court ordered respondent to file a
response to this motion within forty-five days. On September 7, 2016, this Court received a letter
from respondent requesting that this Court give petitioner the required notices pursuant to United
Stales v. Miller, 197 F.3d 644 (3d Cir. 1999). Respondent’s request will be denied as
unnecessary. Petitioner filled out her
§ 2255 form on the form supplied by the Clerk. That form
includes the necessary Miller notices that petitioner certified to being aware of and
understanding. (See Dkt. No. I at p.15)
Accordingly, IT IS this 8th day of September, 2016,
ORDERED that respondent’s request that this Court supply petitioner with the Miller
notices (Dkt. No. 6) is denied as unnecessary; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Order on petitioner by regular U.S. mail.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?