Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 21 Motion to Remand to State Court, 25 Report and Recommendations filed by STEVEN WINOGRAD ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 7/10/17. (DD, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Civ. No. 2:16-cv-04914 (WJM) STEVEN WINOGRAD, Plaintiff, ORDER v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC., et al., Defendants. This products liability action was removed to federal court on August 11, 2016. Plaintiff Steven Winograd (“Plaintiff”) subsequently moved to join three additional defendants, Prestige Auto, Inc., Ferrara’s Auto Body, and Daimler Trust of Forth Worth Texas, and to remand the case. On June 14, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Mark Falk issued a Report and Recommendation finding that Plaintiff’s motion for joinder pursuant to 28 U.SC. § 1447(e) should be granted and that the case should be remanded for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction because two of the newly joined defendants share New Jersey citizenship with Plaintiff. In his Report, Judge Falk soundly applied the factors under Hensgens v. Deere & Co., 833 F.2d 1179, 1182 (5th Cir. 1987) and found no impropriety in the joinder of the three additional defendants. Because federal diversity jurisdiction no longer exists, the case must be remanded. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e). 1 For the reasons set forth in detail in the Report and Recommendation, and for good cause appearing; IT IS on this 10th day of July 2017, hereby, ORDERED that Defendants’ objections to the Report and Recommendation are overruled; and it is further ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mark Falk is adopted as the Opinion of this Court; and it is further ORDERED that this matter is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of New Jersey. /s/ William J. Martini WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J. . 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?