STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY et al v. AVALON BAY COMMUNITIES, INC.

Filing 21

OPINION AND ORDER granting 12 Motion to Consolidate Cases. State Farm Action and the Allstate Action shall be consolidated under Civ. No. 16-cv-05441-WHW-CLW, and all further filings shall be captioned and docketed therein. Signed by Judge William H. Walls on 3/22/17. (cm, )

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY and WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Civ. No. 16-6142 (WHW-CLW) Plaintiffs, V. AVALON BAY COMMUNITIES, INC., Defendant. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY., OPINION AND ORDER Civ. No. 16-5441 (WHW-CLW) Plaintiff, V. AVALON BAY COMMUNITIES, INC., Defendant. Walls, Senior District Judge This matter is before the Court on the motion by Plaintiffs State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and Wesco Insurance Company brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) to consolidate the matter captioned State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, et at. v. Avalon Bay Communities, Inc., Civ. No. 2:16-cv-06142-WHW-CLW (the “State Farm Action”), with the class action captioned, Allstate New Jersey Insurance Company v. Avalon Bay Communities, Inc. ,Civ. No. 2: 16-cv-05441-WHW-CLW (the “Allstate Action”). ECF No. 12. Defendant in both actions, AvalonBay Communities, initially consented to consolidation of the matters, ECF No. 12-1 ¶ 10, but it withdrew its consent because it believed State Farm’s motion to consolidate 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION also sought an indefinite stay of AvalonBay’s motion to dismiss filed in the Allstate Action. ECF No. 13 at 1—2. The Court decided AvalonBay’s motion to dismiss the Allstate Action on January 17, 2017, ECF No. 21, thereby mitigating AvalonBay’s concern. Though there is a motion for reconsideration of that decision pending, ECF No. 24, consolidating the Allstate and State Farm actions will not affect that motion. In a letter to Magistrate Judge Waldor, Defendant suggested that this Court is bound by a preliminary injunction recently entered by Judge Linares in the matter of DeMarco v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc., Civ. No. 15-628, a putative class action lawsuit brought against AvalonBay Communities by former residents and occupants of the Russell Building of the Avalon at Edgewater apartment complex whose property was destroyed by the fire. The present parties and their interests are not within the scope of the Deliarco injunction. Parties different in status are present: insurance companies allege vested subrogation rights. No members of the Deliarco settlement class are involved nor will any such members benefit. This action is not brought on behalf of the Deliarco parties or class members. Rule 42(a) authorizes this Court to order that cases be consolidated when they “involve a common question of law or fact.” The Third Circuit has noted that the power to consolidate matters is “broad” A.S. ex rel. Miller v. SmithKtine Beecham Corp., 769 F.3d 204, 212 (3d Cir. 2014). “The purpose of consolidation is to streamline and economize pretrial proceedings so as to avoid duplication of effort, and to prevent conflicting outcomes in cases involving similar legal and factual issues.” In Re TMILitig., 193 F.3d 613, 724 (3d Cir. 1999) (citation omitted). Both Allstate and State Farm seek subrogation stemming from a fire which occurred at Defendant’s residential apartment complex on January 21, 2015. ECF No. 12-1 at 4. These shared legal and factual issues make consolidation appropriate in this case, and it is hereby 2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDERED that: Plaintiff State Farm’s motion to consolidate is granted; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that that the State Farm Action and the Allstate Action shall be consolidated under the earlier filed Allstate Action, Civ. No. 16-cv-05441-WHW-CLW, and all further filings shall be captioned and docketed therein. DATE: Senior Uniféd States District Court Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?