MAHANANDIGARI et al v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES et al

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 40 Report and Recommendations, denying 35 Motion to Reopen Case, filed by MADHU SUDAN REDDY MAHANANDIGARI. Signed by Chief Judge Jose L. Linares on 1/11/18. (DD, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
NAGA SANDHYA MAHANANDIGARI &
MADHU SUDAN REDDY MAHANANDIGARI,
Civil Action No.: 16-8746 (JLL)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
V.

TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, et at.,
Defendants.

This matter comes before the Court by way of Plaintiffs Naga Sandhya Mahanandigari and
Madhu Sudan Reddy Mahanandigari’s objection to Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion’s Report
and Recommendation dated November 9, 2017. (ECF No. 40). For the reasons set forth in the
Court’s corresponding Opinion,
IT IS on this

///f

day of January, 2018,

ORDERED that the Court hereby adopts Judge Mannion’s Report and Recommendation
dated November 9, 2017 (ECF No. 40) and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Case and Amend Complaint (ECF No. 35)
is hereby DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that this matter shall remain CLOSED.

United States District Court