NORTHEASTERN LUMBER MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION v. SKY OF NEW YORK CORPORATION et al

Filing 8

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 12/29/16. (rg, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NORTHEASTERN LUMBER MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, Civ. Action No. 16-9487 P1 aintiff, V. SKY OF NEW YORK CORP., and TONG-IN INTERNATIONAL USA INC. Defendants. ORDER John IichaeI Vazguez, U.S.D.J. This matter having been opened to the Court by Plaintiff Northeastern Lumber Manufacturers Association (“NeLMA” or “Plaintiffs”) by motion seeking temporary restraints and a preliminary injunction’ hearing schedule (D.E. 1); and the Court having reviewed the submissions and arguments of Plaintiff; and for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion and on the record during the December 29, 2016 hearing; and for good cause shown, It is on this 29th day of December, 2016, ORDERED that PlaintifFs request for temporary restraints is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Defendants shall not use in any manner the NeLMA certification stamps bearing identification number 09L 156; and it is frirther A separate order setting forth the preliminary injunction hearing schedule was filed on the docket in conjunction with this order. ORDERED that Defendants shall not ship, sell, distribute, or otherwise disburse in any manner any material or product bearing the NeLMA certification stamps with identification number 091156, and Defendant shall segregate and safeguard any such material or product; and it is further ORDERED that Defendants shall preserve any and all records or other information relating to products the NeLMA certification stamps with identification number 091156; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall post security in the amount of $5,000.00 with the Clerk of the Court. John’!vlichael Vazqu 7 , .D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?