MANCIA-SALAZAR v. JOHNSON
OPINION. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 07/20/2017. (ek)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
JOSE VIELMAN MANCIA-SALAZAR, :
Civil Action No. 17-147 (JMV)
On January 9, 2017, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1), challenging his prolonged detention by U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (“ICE”). On March 13, 2017, Respondent filed a response to the petition, opposing
habeas relief. (ECF No. 6.) On July 13, 2017, the Court granted the habeas petition and ordered
Respondent to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing. (ECF Nos. 7, 8.) Now before the Court is
Respondent’s letter requesting that the Court vacate its Order dated July 13, 2017. (ECF No. 9.)
Respondent contends this matter became moot when Petitioner was granted asylum and released
from custody on July 12, 2017. (ECF No. 9.) 1
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) provides that “on motion and just terms, the court
may relieve a party . . . from a final judgment, order, or proceeding” for any reason “that justifies
relief.” A habeas petition “generally becomes moot when [a petitioner] is released from custody”
because there is no longer “an actual injury traceable to the defendant and likely to be redressed
Respondent submitted a copy of the order granting Petitioner asylum and the order to release.
(ECF Nos. 9-1, 9-2.)
by a favorable judicial decision.” Vasquez v. Aviles, 639 F. App’x 898, 902 (3d Cir. 2016) (quoting
DeFoy v. McCullough, 393 F.3d 439, 442 (3d Cir. 2005)). Unbeknownst to the Court, Petitioner
was no longer in custody, and the petition was moot when the Court granted it on July 13, 2017.
Therefore, the Court grants the request to vacate its Order of July 13, 2017, and dismisses the
petition as moot.
An appropriate Order follows.
Date: July 20, 2017
at Newark, New Jersey
s/ John Michael Vazquez
JOHN MICHAEL VAZQUEZ
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?