JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. JOHNSON et al

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 22 in full and it is further Ordered that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand this case to State Court 10 id Granted; and it is further Ordered that this matter is Remand to Superior Court, Chancery Division, Morris County ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 11/15/2017. (JB, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CHAMBERS OF MARTIN LUTHER KING COURTHOUSE 50 WALNUT ST. ROOM 5076 NEWARK, NJ 07101 973-297-4887 ESTHER SALAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE November 15, 2017 LETTER ORDER Re: JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat’l Assoc. v. Johnson, et al. Civil Action No. 17-2719 (ES) (SCM) Dear Parties: On August 23, 2017, Plaintiff moved to remand this case to state court. (D.E. No. 10 (“Motion”)). Defendants opposed Plaintiff’s Motion (D.E. No. 12), and Plaintiff replied (D.E. No. 21). On October 11, 2017, the Hon. Steven C. Mannion, U.S.M.J., issued a Report and Recommendation that the undersigned grant Plaintiff’s Motion. (D.E. No. 22 (the “R&R”)). Magistrate Judge Mannion provided the parties fourteen days to file and serve any objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 72.1(c)(2). (Id. at 7). The parties did not file any objections. The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Mannion’s R&R, and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS on this 15th day of November 2017, ORDERED that this Court adopts Magistrate Judge Mannion’s R&R (D.E. No. 22) in full; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to remand this case to state court (D.E. No. 10) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE docket entries 10 and 22; and it is further ORDERED that this matter is hereby REMANDED to Superior Court, Chancery Division, Morris County. s/Esther Salas Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?