CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. AMT008174 v. VMA CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al
Filing
13
ORDER denying 11 Motion for Default Judgment, w/out prejudice; that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; that this matter shall be CLOSED by the Clerk of the Court; that the Court will re-open this matter upon the filing of an amended complaint establishing subject matter jurisdiction consistent with the accompanying Memorandum by no later than 14 days from this Order. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 1/5/18. (DD, )
Not for Publication
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING
TO POLICY NO. AMT008174,
Plaintiff,
v.
VMA CONSTRUCTION, LLC and
VENUGOPAL MARRI,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil Action No. 17-5626 (ES) (SCM)
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s,
London, subscribing to Policy Number AMT008174’s motion for default judgment (D.E. No.
11); and the Court having carefully considered this matter without oral argument pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b); and for the reasons in the accompanying Memorandum,
IT IS on this 5th day of January 2018,
ORDERED that the motion for default judgment (D.E. No. 11) is DENIED without
prejudice; and it is further
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction; and it is further
ORDERED that this matter shall be CLOSED by the Clerk of the Court; and it is further
-1-
ORDERED that the Court will re-open this matter upon the filing of an amended
complaint establishing subject matter jurisdiction consistent with the accompanying
Memorandum by no later than 14 days from this Order.
s/ Esther Salas
Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?