BHATT v. CARTMELL et al

Filing 49

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the 1 Complaint should be dismissed without Prejudice; All pending motions in this matter (ECF Nos. 20 , 42 ) shall be administratively terminated. ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED*** Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 8/26/2020. (ams, )

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-06183-CCC-SCM Document 49 Filed 08/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 824 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Civil Action No.: 17-6183 CHAULA S. BHATT, Plaintiff, ORDER v. EMILY CARTMELL, et al., Defendants. CECCHI, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Order of Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion directing plaintiff Chaula Bhatt (“Plaintiff”) to explain her absence from the December 3, 2019 status conference call in this matter. ECF No. 40. Plaintiff did not respond to the Court’s Order. On August 11, 2020, Judge Mannion issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) that the Court dismiss the complaint (ECF No. 1) without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this case and comply with court orders, noting that Plaintiff has failed to attend three consecutive status conferences and has been inactive on the case docket since May 20, 2019. ECF No. 48 at 2. No objections have been filed to the R&R. The Court has considered Judge Mannion’s R&R, and for substantially the same reasons stated therein: IT IS on this 26th day of August 2020: ORDERED that this Court adopts Judge Mannion’s August 11, 2020 R&R that the complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that all pending motions in this matter (ECF Nos. 20, 42) shall be administratively terminated in light of dismissal of the complaint; and it is finally ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the file in this matter. SO ORDERED. __________________________ CLAIRE C. CECCHI, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?