MALCOLM v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM & ORDER, that within 45 days of the date of this Order, Petitioner must submit an amended petition which clearly identifies all grounds for habeas relief, as well as the facts supporting each ground; if any of the claims contained in the a mended petition are unexhausted, Petitioner must also file a motion for stay; if Petitioner fails to submit an amended petition, the Court will only adjudicate those claims in the original petition which comply with Rule 2, and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court Administratively terminate this matter at this time, etc. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 8/6/2019. (JB, )
Not For Publication
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
____________________________________
:
:
:
Petitioner,
:
:
v.
:
:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY,
:
:
Respondent.
:
____________________________________:
SEAN MALCOLM,
Civil Action No. 17-6339 (ES)
MEMORANDUM ORDER
SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE
It appearing that:
1. This matter is before the Court on the submission of a Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by Petitioner Sean Malcolm (“Petitioner”). (D.E. No. 1).
2. Since the inception of this case, the Court has informed Petitioner several times
regarding the deficiencies in his Petition and request for a stay. (See D.E. Nos. 2, 6, 8 & 10).
The Court will not re-state the procedural history again in this Order, but suffice it to say that
Petitioner has been given ample opportunity to file a habeas petition which clearly and specifically
identifies his grounds for relief, as well as a properly supported motion for a stay if any of his
claims are unexhausted. (Id.).
3. In his most recent submission, Petitioner acknowledges that he has failed to comply
with the Court’s prior instructions. (D.E. No. 12). According to Petitioner, he has been unable
to do so because he has been ill and housed in the administrative segregation infirmary, with no
access to the law library. (Id.). He advised that he is expecting to be transferred to New Jersey
State Prison in the near future and would have access to legal help at that time. (Id.).1
4. In light of his pro se status, and the limitations due to his illness, the Court will give
Petitioner a final opportunity to file an amended petition which clearly identifies all federal
grounds for habeas relief and any supporting facts. If any of the claims contained in the amended
petition are unexhausted, Petitioner must also file a motion for a stay which shows that his
unexhausted claims are potentially meritorious; that he has good cause for failing to exhaust; and
the absence of intentionally dilatory litigation tactics. Rhines, 544 U.S. at 278.
IT IS therefore on this 6th day of August 2019,
ORDERED that within 45 days of the date of this Order, Petitioner must submit an
amended petition which clearly identifies all grounds for habeas relief, as well as the facts
supporting each ground; if any of the claims contained in the amended petition are unexhausted,
Petitioner must also file a motion for a stay; if Petitioner fails to submit an amended petition, the
Court will only adjudicate those claims in the original Petition which comply with Rule 2; and it
is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this matter
at this time; upon receipt of an amended petition from Petitioner, or the expiration of the time to
submit an amended petition, the Court will re-open the case to adjudicate the relevant issues; and
it is further
1
The Court notes that according to the New Jersey Department of Corrections Inmate Locator Database, it
appears that Petitioner was in fact transferred to New Jersey State Prison after he submitted his letter. See
https://www20.state.nj.us/DOC Inmate/details?x=1318099&n=0.
2
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Order upon Petitioner by
regular U.S. mail at New Jersey State Prison.
s/Esther Salas
Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?