PERRY v. ADT LLC et al
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 6 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County, Law Division filed by ZURINAH PERRY, 11 Report and Recommendations ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 3/8/18. (DD, )
Not for Publication
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
ZURINAH PERRY,
Plaintiff,
v.
ADT LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil Action No. 17-6676 (ES) (MAH)
ORDER
SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff Zurinah Perry’s (“Perry”) motion
to remand this action to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County (D.E. No. 6); and
Defendant ADT LLC (“Defendant ADT”) having opposed Perry’s motion to remand (D.E. No.
9); and the Honorable Michael A. Hammer, United States Magistrate Judge, having issued a
Report and Recommendation (the “R & R”) that the Undersigned grant Perry’s motion and
remand this matter (D.E. No. 11); and Defendant ADT having filed objections to the R & R; and
the Court having opted to rule without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
78(b); and for the reasons in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion,
IT IS on this 8th day of March 2018,
ORDERED that the R & R (D.E. No. 11) is ADOPTED in relevant part; and it is further
ORDERED that Perry’s motion to remand (D.E. No. 6) is GRANTED in relevant part;
and it is further
ORDERED that this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of New Jersey,
Middlesex County, Law Division; and it is further
-1-
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.
s/Esther Salas
Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?