GOODWIN v. SERGEANT PERCILI et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 29 Report and Recommendations; that Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice; ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 2/19/2020. (ld, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CHAMBERS OF MARTIN LUTHER KING COURTHOUSE 50 WALNUT ST. ROOM 5076 NEWARK, NJ 07101 973-297-4887 ESTHER SALAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE February 19, 2020 LETTER ORDER Re: Goodwin v. Sergeant Percili, et al. Civil Action No. 17-13368 (ES) (MAH) Dear parties: On November 22, 2019, the Honorable Michael A. Hammer, United States Magistrate Judge, issued an Order to Show Cause directing plaintiff Michael J. Goodwin (“Plaintiff”) to “show cause, in writing . . . why his complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute it under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, for failure to comply with [various Court Orders].” (D.E. No. 27 at 2). After Plaintiff failed to timely respond to the Order to Show Cause, Judge Hammer issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b). (D.E. No. 29 (“R&R”)). Magistrate Judge Hammer provided the parties fourteen days to file and serve objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 72.1(c)(2). The parties did not file any objections. The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Hammer’s R&R, and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS on this 19th day of February 2020, ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Hammer’s R&R is adopted in full; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE docket entry number 29 and CLOSE THIS CASE. s/Esther Salas Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?