WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. SCHILDKNECHT et al
OPINION and ORDER denying 29 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. etc. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 11/16/2020. (dam)
Case 2:20-cv-00677-SRC-SCM Document 33 Filed 11/16/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 225
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
ANN R. SCHILDKNECHT et al.,
Civil Action No. 20-677 (SRC)
OPINION & ORDER
CHESLER, District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on the motion by Defendant Ellen Heine (“Heine”)
for reconsideration of the Opinion and Order dated July 30, 2020, which granted the motion to
remand filed by Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”). On that same date, after this
Court’s Order was filed, the Clerk of this Court mailed the remand transmittal letter to the
Superior Court of New Jersey. That act of mailing terminated this Court’s jurisdiction to take
any further action in this case. “[A] district court loses jurisdiction over a case once it has
completed the remand by sending a certified copy of the remand order to the state court.” Trans
Penn Wax Corp. v. McCandless, 50 F.3d 217, 225 (3d Cir. 1995). This Court lacks jurisdiction
to consider the motion for reconsideration, which must be denied.
For these reasons,
IT IS on this 16th day of November, 2020
Case 2:20-cv-00677-SRC-SCM Document 33 Filed 11/16/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 226
ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for reconsideration (Docket Entry No. 29)
s/Stanley R. Chesler
STANLEY R. CHESLER, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?