CONQUEST v. HAYMAN et al

Filing 157

ORDER granting 120 Motion for Summary Judgment ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED; denying 140 Motion ; denying 142 Motion to Dismiss ADJUDGED that JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFFS ON ALL CLAIMS ASSERTED BY THE PLAINTIFFS; Signed by Judge Mary L. ooper on 3/31/11. (dd, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DARRYL V. CONQUEST, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE HAYMAN, et al., Defendants. WILLIAM STOVALL, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE HAYMAN, et al., Defendants. MAJOR G. TILLERY, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE HAYMAN, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER & JUDGMENT Civil Action No. 07-2125 (MLC)

Civil Action No. 07-3062 (MLC)

Civil Action No. 07-2662 (MLC)

For the reasons expressed in the Court's Memorandum Opinion, dated March 31, 2011, IT IS on this 31st ay of March, 2011,

ORDERED that the defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 (Docket Entry No. 120) is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the motions by the plaintiff William Stovall to dismiss defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket entry nos. 140 and 142) are DENIED; and it is further ADJUDGED that JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFFS ON ALL CLAIMS ASSERTED BY THE PLAINTIFFS; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court designate all of these actions as CLOSED.

s/Mary L. Cooper MARY L. COOPER United States District Judge

2