VOLVO FINANCIAL SERVICES v. SIFTRANS, INC. et al

Filing 13

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Mary L. Cooper on 4/20/09. (lk)

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VOLVO FINANCIAL SERVICES, Plaintiff, v. SIFTRANS, INC., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3547 (MLC) MEMORANDUM OPINION THE plaintiff bringing this action concerning the breach of four contracts for the purchase of automobiles (dkt. entry no. 1, Compl.); and the plaintiff moving for entry of judgment by default against the defendants in the amount of $298,132.06 ("Motion") (dkt. entry no. 12, Default J. Mot.), see Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2); and THE PLAINTIFF previously demonstrating that (1) the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction, and (2) the defendants were served at 717 Summer Drive, Manalapan, New Jersey (dkt. entry no. 4, Pl. Br. at 3-4; id., Block Aff. at 1-2; id., Exs. 2-5, Affs. of Service; dkt. entry no. 7, Proof of Service on Defendants); and the Court confirming on the Westlaw database that the defendants may be found at the aforementioned address; and the Clerk of the Court having entered default against the defendants for their failure to appear (see unnumbered dkt. entry after dkt. entry no. 8), see Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a); and THE PLAINTIFF observing all of the formalities in bringing the Motion, including the filing of a certificate of service demonstrating that the Motion has been served on the defendants (dkt. entry no. 12, Certif. of Service); and the defendants failing to oppose the Motion, even though the return date -- April 6, 2009 -- elapsed two weeks ago (see unnumbered dkt. entry after dkt. entry no. 12); and THE PLAINTIFF demonstrating to the Court that (1) it is owed (a) $32,309.37 on the first contract, (b) $41,128.93 on the second contract, (c) $98,908.77 on the third contract, and (d) $125,784.99 on the fourth contract, (2) it is owed $298,132.06 in total, and (3) the defendants are liable pursuant to a continuing guaranty (dkt. entry no. 12, Morgan Certif. at 1-8; id., Exs. 117); and it appearing that the defendants have not petitioned for bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey, and thus this action is not subject to a stay, see www.njb.uscourts.gov; and THE COURT (1) determining the Motion upon the plaintiff's papers, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b), and (2) intending to (a) grant the Motion, and (b) enter judgment against the defendants; and for good cause appearing, the Court will issue an appropriate Order and Judgment. s/ Mary L. Cooper MARY L. COOPER United States District Judge Dated: April 20, 2009 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?