BRANDT v. HOGAN et al

Filing 44

ORDER denying 34 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. Pltf's application for appointment of pro bono counsel is GRANTED, with counsel to be determined in a subsequent order. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 4/18/2013. (drw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
________________________________
:
JOHN BRANDT,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
ELIZABETH HOGAN, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
________________________________ :

Case No. 10-4944(FLW)(DEA)

ORDER

THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court by Defendants Elizabeth Hogan,
Patricia Foundas, Benito Marty, Reed Gladey, John Main, Jennifer Velez, and Susikala
Pasupuleti (“Defendants”), through their counsel David L. DaCosta, Esq., on a motion for
summary judgment on all counts of the Complaint; Plaintiff John Brandt, pro se, having
submitted opposition thereto and a cross-motion for summary judgment on Count II of the
Complaint; also pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed application for appointment of
pro bono counsel; the Court having considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers filed by
the parties; this matter being considered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; for the reasons stated in
the Opinion filed on this date, and for good cause shown;
IT IS on this 18th day of April, 2013
ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and it is
further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application for the appointment of pro bono counsel is
GRANTED, with counsel to be determined in a subsequent order.

1

/s/ Freda L. Wolfson
Honorable Freda L. Wolfson
United States District Judge

2