HARRIS v. LANIGAN et al
Filing
82
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 40 is Granted ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 7/1/2016. (km)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
MS. GOLDA D. HARRIS,
Civil Action No. 11-1321 (MAS) (DEA)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER GARY LANIGAN,
et al.,
Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court on a civil Complaint filed by Plaintiff Golda D. Harris
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, alleging that her rights under federal law have been violated.
Presently before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 40, and a Report and
Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert, recommending dismissal, ECF No. 54.
The Court has carefully reviewed the parties' submissions on this matter. For the reasons stated
in the Memorandum Opinion filed on even date, and for good cause shown,
IT IS on this
f'S(-
day of
({'Ll.tt
,
2016,
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert,
ECF No. 54, is hereby ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court; it is further
ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 40, is hereby GRANTED; it is
further
ORDERED that Plaintiff's requests for default and default judgement, ECF Nos. 77 & 78,
are hereby DENIED; it is further
ORDERED that the Complaint, ECF No. 1, is hereby DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order and the accompanying
Memorandum Opinion upon the parties, and shall CLOSE the file.
Mic~D-.J-.- - - - - -
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?