PRALL v. DISTRICT COURT

Filing 7

ORDER THAT THE R & R IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE MOTION REQUESTING THE COURT NOT TO TRANSFER THIS CASE TO NEW JERSEY IS DENIED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS TRANSFERRED TO THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DIST. OF NEW JERSEY; AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/27/14. 5/27/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND UNREP PARTY, 1 COPY TO EILEEN BOBB.(pr, ) Modified on 5/27/2014 (pr, ).

Download PDF
FM.aJ f1, )' 2 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2rJf.f, CIVIL ACTION TORMU E. PRALL, Petitioner, v. NO. 13-6391 DISTRICT COURT, Respondents. ---·--- - --- ----- -- ------ --- -- ORDER AND NOW, this ~I?:£ day of'-/?-z..o.(/- , 2014, upon indepenoent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report rd Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. the R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. the Motion Requesting the Court Not to Transfer this Case to New Jersey is 3. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is TRANSFERRED TO THE DENIED; DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY; and 4. there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: ENTERED MAY 2 7 2014 CLERK OF COURT MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J. - ---- ---- - -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?