PRALL v. DISTRICT COURT
Filing
7
ORDER THAT THE R & R IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE MOTION REQUESTING THE COURT NOT TO TRANSFER THIS CASE TO NEW JERSEY IS DENIED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS TRANSFERRED TO THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DIST. OF NEW JERSEY; AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/27/14. 5/27/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND UNREP PARTY, 1 COPY TO EILEEN BOBB.(pr, ) Modified on 5/27/2014 (pr, ).
FM.aJ f1, )' 2 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
2rJf.f,
CIVIL ACTION
TORMU E. PRALL,
Petitioner,
v.
NO. 13-6391
DISTRICT COURT,
Respondents.
---·--- - --- ----- -- ------ --- --
ORDER
AND NOW, this
~I?:£ day of'-/?-z..o.(/- , 2014, upon indepenoent
consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report
rd
Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1.
the R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2.
the Motion Requesting the Court Not to Transfer this Case to New Jersey is
3.
the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is TRANSFERRED TO THE
DENIED;
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY; and
4.
there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
ENTERED
MAY 2 7 2014
CLERK OF COURT
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.
- ----
---- - -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?