BELLAK et al v. WELLS FARGO & CO. et al
Filing
20
OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 12/19/2017. (mps)
.:,
f
RECEIVED
DEC 19 2017
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
I
JEFFREY A. BELLAK; THERESA P.
CIBOTTI; MARC S. CRAMER; THOMAS J. I
CROWE; JOHN F.-DALLY; JOHN
I~
FUHRMEISTER; PHILIP CARUSO;
JEFFREY B. NUSSBAUM; CHARLES
McKENNA AND JANE/JOHN DOE(s)
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
CONSULTANTS,
Civ. No. 17-2757
OPINION
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO & CO., WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A., DBA WELLS FARGO HOME
MORTGAGE; ABC CORPORATION(S) 110 and/or JANE/JOHN DOES(S)
SUPERVISORS 1-10, individually and/or as
agents, servants and/or employees of the
above-named corporate defendants and ABC
Corporation( s) 1-10,
Defendants.
THOMPSON. U.S.D.J.
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on a renewed motion to dismiss brought by
Defendants Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendants"). (ECF No. 13.)
Plaintiffs Jeffrey A. Bellak, Theresa P. Cibotti, Marc S. Cramer, Thomas J. Crowe, John F.
Dally, John Fuhrmeister, Philip Caruso, Jeffrey B. Nussbaum, and Charles McKenna
("Plaintiffs") oppose and cross-move for leave to amend their pleading. (ECF No. 16.)
Defendants oppose the Cross-Motion. (ECF No. 19.) The Court has decided the motions based
on the parties' written submissions and without oral argument pursuant to Local Civil Rule
1
"
'
78.1 (b ). For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' Motion is granted and Plaintiffs' CrossMotion is denied.
BACKGROUND
This case involves Defendants' alleged wrongful termination of Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs'
allegations are as follows. Plaintiffs are citizens of New Jersey or Pennsylvania, and are former
employees of Defendant Wells Fargo & Co. ("Defendant Wells"), within the Wells Fargo Home
Mortgage Division of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant Wells N.A."). (Am.
Compl.,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?