ROSS v. JOHNSON et al

Filing 28

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to reopen this action and that the Clerk shall serve the Bureau a notice of electronic filing of this order; if the action is refer County Prosecutor, the Bureau will use its best efforts to file a referral letter indicating the name of that office within 14 calendar days from the date of the Order to Answer; It is Ordered that Respondents shall file a full and complete answer to all claims asserted in the habeas petition within 45 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 06/02/2020. (jmh)

Case 3:17-cv-03135-PGS Document 28 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 145

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
_________________________________________
MARTY ROSS,
:
:
Petitioner,
:
Civ. No. 17-3135 (PGS)
:
v.
:
:
STEVEN JOHNSON, et al.,
:
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
:
Respondents.
:
_________________________________________ :
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Third Circuit remanded this matter back to this Court after it
determined that equitable tolling was warranted to excuse Petitioner’s untimeliness of his habeas
petition. Accordingly, the Clerk will be ordered to reopen this action so that the habeas petition
can be screened.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and having screened the habeas petition for summary
dismissal pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States
District Courts (“Habeas Rules”), this Court concludes that it does not “plainly appear[ ] from
the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief ….” Accordingly,
Respondents will be ordered to file a response to the habeas petition.
Therefore, IT IS this 2ND day of June, 2020,
ORDERED that the Clerk shall reopen this action; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Habeas
Rules, a Notice of Electronic Filing of this Order on the State of New Jersey, Department of Law
& Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice, Appellate Bureau (“the Bureau”), in accordance
with the Memorandum of Understanding between this Court and the Bureau; and it is further

Case 3:17-cv-03135-PGS Document 28 Filed 06/02/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 146

ORDERED also in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding, that if the
Bureau intends to refer the action to a County Prosecutor’s Office, the Bureau will use its best
efforts to upload to CM/ECF a “referral letter” indicating the name of that office within fourteen
(14) calendar days from the date of this order to answer; and it is further
ORDERED that Respondents shall file a full and complete answer to all claims asserted
in the habeas petition within forty-five (45) days of the entry of this order; and it is further
ORDERED that Respondents’ answer shall respond to each factual and legal allegation
of the habeas petition, in accordance with Habeas Rule 5(b); and it is further
ORDERED that Respondents’ answer shall address the merits of each claim raised in the
habeas petition by citing to relevant federal law; and it is further
ORDERED that, in addition to addressing the merits of each claim, Respondents shall
raise by way of its answer any appropriate defenses which they wish to have the Court consider,
including, but not limited to, exhaustion and procedural default, and also including, with respect
to the asserted defenses, relevant legal arguments with citations to appropriate federal legal
authority; all non-jurisdictional affirmative defenses subject to waiver not raised in Respondents’
answer or at the earliest practicable moment thereafter may be deemed waived; and it is further
ORDERED that Respondents’ answer shall adhere to the requirements of Habeas Rule
5(c) and (d) in providing the relevant state court record of proceedings, including any pro se
filings; and it is further
ORDERED that the answer shall contain an index of exhibits identifying each document
from the relevant state court proceedings that is filed with the answer; and it is further
ORDERED that Respondents shall electronically file the answer, the exhibits, and the list
of exhibits; and it is further

2

Case 3:17-cv-03135-PGS Document 28 Filed 06/02/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 147

ORDERED that all exhibits to the Answer must be identified by a descriptive name
in the electronic filing entry, for example:
“Exhibit #1 Transcript of [type of proceeding] held on XX/XX/XXXX” or
“Exhibit #2 Opinion entered on XX/XX/XXXX by Judge YYYY”; and it is
further
ORDERED that Petitioner may file and serve a reply to the answer within forty-five (45)
days after Respondents file the answer, see Habeas Rule 5(e); it is further
ORDERED that, within seven (7) days after any change in Petitioner’s custody status, be
it release or otherwise, Respondents shall electronically file a written notice of the same with the
Clerk of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Petitioner by
regular U.S. mail.

s/Peter G. Sheridan
PETER G. SHERIDAN, U.S.D.J.

3