CUDJOE v. VENTURES TRUST 2013I-H-R BY MCM CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLP et al
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part Defendant Ventures Trust's 72 Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint; the Second Amended Complaint 79 is DISMISSED as to Defendant Ventures Trust on Count Five (conspiracy). Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 7/22/2019. (jem)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
MARY CUDJOE,
Civ. No. 18-10158
Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM ORDER
v.
VENTURES TRUST 2013 I-H-R BY
MCM CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLLP f/k/a
MCM CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
WILLIAM BRAUKMANN, and
KIMBERLY BRAUKMANN,
Third-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
FAY SERVICING, et al.,
Third-Party Defendants.
THOMPSON, U.S.D.J.
IT APPEARING that Defendant Ventures Trust 2013 I-H-R by MCM Capital Partners,
LLLP, formerly known as MCM Capital Partners, LLC (“Ventures Trust”), files a Motion to
Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 72); and it further
APPEARING that the arguments made by Defendant Ventures Trust in the pending
Motion have already been addressed by the Court when deciding whether to dismiss the First
Amended Complaint (Op. at 8–10, ECF No. 63 (dismissing conspiracy claim but not New Jersey
Consumer Fraud Act claim)); and it further
APPEARING that the substance of the Second Amended Complaint is comparable to the
1
First Amended Complaint for the purposes of this Motion (compare, e.g., 2d Am. Compl. ¶¶ 88–
97, ECF No. 79, with 1st Am. Compl. ¶¶ 94–98, ECF No. 54 (conspiracy claim)), making the
Court’s prior reasoning applicable to the present Motion;
IT IS on this 22nd day of July, 2019,
ORDERED that Defendant Ventures Trust’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended
Complaint (ECF No. 72) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is further
ORDERED that the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 79) is DISMISSED as to
Defendant Ventures Trust on Count Five (conspiracy) (2d Am Compl. ¶¶ 88–97).
/s/ Anne E. Thompson
ANNE E. THOMPSON, U.S.D.J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?