Duran, et al v. King, et al

Filing 3338

ORDER FINDING SUSTAINED COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 16 OF THE SECOND REVISED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. (nlb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DWIGHT DURAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civ. No. 77-00721 KK/SCY MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM et al., Defendants. ORDER FINDING SUSTAINED COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 16 OF THE SECOND REVISED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on the Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Finding of Sustained Compliance with Paragraph 16 of the Second Revised Settlement Agreement the Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds that it is well taken. THEREFORE, it is found that Defendants have sustained compliance with Paragraph 16 of the Second Revised Settlement Agreement. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants have sustained compliance with Paragraph 16 of the Second Revised Settlement Agreement for six (6) months from the entry of the Order finding substantial compliance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, Paragraph 16 is disengaged, the Court’s oversight over Paragraph 16 is terminated, and Defendants are no longer required to report on Paragraph 16 or compensate the Plaintiffs for attorney, paralegal, or investigator time spent monitoring Paragraph 16. ____________________________________ KIRTAN KHALSA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respectfully submitted, ROBLES, RAEL & ANAYA, P.C. By: APPROVED BY: Law Office of Alexandra Freedman Smith Approved via email on May 5, 2023 Alexandra Freedman Smith 925 Luna Circle, NW Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 200-2331 asmith@smith-law.nm.com Attorney for Plaintiff Class 2 /s/ Taylor S. Rahn Taylor S. Rahn Attorney for Defendants 500 Marquette NW, Suite 700 Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 242-2228 (505) 242-1106 (facsimile) taylor@roblesrael.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?