Duran, et al v. King, et al
Filing
3338
ORDER FINDING SUSTAINED COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 16 OF THE SECOND REVISED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. (nlb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
DWIGHT DURAN et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Civ. No. 77-00721 KK/SCY
MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER FINDING SUSTAINED COMPLIANCE WITH
PARAGRAPH 16 OF THE SECOND REVISED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on the Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for
Finding of Sustained Compliance with Paragraph 16 of the Second Revised Settlement
Agreement the Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds that it is well taken.
THEREFORE, it is found that Defendants have sustained compliance with Paragraph
16 of the Second Revised Settlement Agreement.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants have
sustained compliance with Paragraph 16 of the Second Revised Settlement Agreement for six
(6) months from the entry of the Order finding substantial compliance.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, Paragraph 16 is disengaged, the Court’s oversight over
Paragraph 16 is terminated, and Defendants are no longer required to report on Paragraph 16 or
compensate the Plaintiffs for attorney, paralegal, or investigator time spent monitoring Paragraph
16.
____________________________________
KIRTAN KHALSA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Respectfully submitted,
ROBLES, RAEL & ANAYA, P.C.
By:
APPROVED BY:
Law Office of Alexandra Freedman Smith
Approved via email on May 5, 2023
Alexandra Freedman Smith
925 Luna Circle, NW
Albuquerque, NM 87102
(505) 200-2331
asmith@smith-law.nm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff Class
2
/s/ Taylor S. Rahn
Taylor S. Rahn
Attorney for Defendants
500 Marquette NW, Suite 700
Albuquerque, NM 87102
(505) 242-2228
(505) 242-1106 (facsimile)
taylor@roblesrael.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?