Hatten-Gonzales v. Earnest
Filing
947
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales setting deadline of 5:00 p.m. on April 10, 2020,for the parties to file their respective documents and affidavits, narrowing each set of documents and affidavits to 50 pages. (tah)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
DEBRA HATTEN-GONZALES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Civ. No. 88-385 KG/CG
Consolidated with
Civ. No. 88-786 KG/CG
DAVID SCRASE, Secretary of the
New Mexico Human Services Department,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On March 27, 2020, the Court ordered
that, by 5:00 p.m. on April 3, 2020, the parties
provide to the Special Master and to the opposing party documents and affidavits in
support of Defendant’s Rule 60(b) Motion to Modify Second Revised Modified
Settlement Agreement and Order Sections II, III and IV(F)(1), (Doc. 893), and Plaintiffs’
Amended Motion to Enforce Compliance with the Consent Decree and Orders of this
Court and Request for Relief, (Doc. 926), respectively….
(Doc. 945) at 1, ¶ 2. The Court further ordered that those documents and affidavits “not exceed
50 pages per party….” Id. at 2, ¶ 3. On April 3, 2020, contrary to Court’s order, Plaintiffs
submitted 79 pages of documents and affidavits while Defendant submitted 54 pages.
The Court, hereby, ORDERS that
1. on or before 5:00 p.m. April 10, 2020, the parties shall file their respective documents
and affidavits, narrowing each set of documents and affidavits to 50 pages;
2. the parties shall not supplement their respective sets of documents and affidavits with
new materials;
3. the Court will not entertain any arguments made within the above filings; and
4. failure to comply with this Order will result in the Court striking all of the offending
party’s documents and affidavits.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?