Doe v. City of Albuquerque

Filing 48

NOTICE by John Doe of Agreed Extension of Time to File Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Egan, Brendan)

Download PDF
Doe v. City of Albuquerque Doc. 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, Defendant. NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, pursuant to D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.4(a), and respectfully notifies the Court that the parties have agreed to an extension of time until July 16, 2009, for Plaintiff to file his reply brief in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 43 and 44, filed May 15, 2009). Respectfully submitted, /s/ Brendan Egan 7/2/2009 George Bach Brendan Egan ACLU of New Mexico Staff Attorneys P.O. Box 566 Albuquerque, NM 87103 (505) 243-0046 Facsimile (505) 266-5916 Maureen A. Sanders Co-Legal Director ACLU of New Mexico Sanders & Westbrook, PC 102 Granite Avenue, NW Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 243-2243 OF COUNSEL Attorneys for Plaintiff CIV. NO. 08-1041 MCA/LFG I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 2, 2009, I filed the foregoing pleading electronically through the CM/ECF system and caused the following parties and/or counsel to be served electronically through the CM/ECF system: Gregory S. Wheeler & Peter H. Pierotti Assistant Albuquerque City Attorneys P.O. Box 2248 Albuquerque, NM 87103 Attorneys for Defendant /s/ Submitted Electronically 7/2/09 Brendan Egan 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?