STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation

Filing 101

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File A Submission of Supplemental Authority by STC. UNM. (Attachments: # 1 STC'S SUBMISSION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY OF AN EN BANC FEDERAL CIRCUIT DECISION IN SUPPORT OF ITS 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS INTEL'S COUNTERCLAIM AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE FOR INEQUITABLE CONDUCT)(Pedersen, Steven)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
STC.UNM,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTEL CORPORATION,

Civil No. 10-CV-01077-RB-WDS

Defendant.

STC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL
AUTHORITY OF AN EN BANC FEDERAL CIRCUIT DECISION IN SUPPORT OF
ITS 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS INTEL'S COUNTERCLAIM AND
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE FOR INEQUITABLE CONDUCT
Last week, the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision dramatically
tightening the elements, including materiality, of the defense of inequitable
conduct, the basis for Plaintiff's pending Rule 12(b)(6) motion (Doc. No. 45).
Plaintiff seeks leave to file a short brief explaining the extreme relevance of the case
(brief is attached hereto).
Intel does not oppose the instant motion for leave so long as it may submit a
short response to STC's supplemental submission, which is reflected in the proposed
order submitted herewith.

1

Dated: June 3, 2011

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Steven R. Pedersen
Rolf O. Stadheim
Joseph A. Grear
George C. Summerfield
Keith A. Vogt
Steven R. Pedersen
STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD.
400 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2200
Chicago, Illinois 60611
[phone]

Deron B. Knoner
KELEHER & MCLEOD, P.A
201 Third Street NW, 12th Floor
PO Box AA
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103
[phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff STC.UNM

Certificate of Service: I hereby certify that on June 3, 2011, I caused the foregoing to
be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which
will send notification of such filing via electronic mail to all counsel of record.
/s/ Steven R. Pedersen

2