STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation
Filing
109
ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack re 106 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Discovery Objections Under D.N.M. LR-Civ.26.6 filed by Intel Corporation (yc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
STC.UNM,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 10-CV-1077 RB/WDS
INTEL CORPORATION,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR
FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS UNDER D.N.M. LR-CIV.26.6
This matter having come before the Court on the parties’ Unopposed Joint Motion for
Further Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery Objections under D.N.M. LR-Civ. 26.6, and
the Court being advised that the Motion is jointly made and unopposed, it is hereby ORDERED
that the current forty-five (45) day period under D.N.M. LR-Civ.26.6 is hereby extended for an
additional twenty-one (21) days for Intel to move to compel regarding STC’s May 2, 2011
privilege logs and responses to Intel’s discovery requests.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 17 day of June, 2011.
____________________________________
HONORABLE ROBERT C. BRACK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Approved:
/s/ Brian L. Ferrall
Clifford K. Atkinson
Douglas A. Baker
Justin D. Rodriguez
ATKINSON, THAL & BAKER, P.C.
Robert A. Van Nest
Brian L. Ferrall
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
Chad S. Campbell
Jonathan M. James
Timothy J. Franks
Mark E. Strickland
Jonathan L. McFarland
PERKINS COIE LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Intel Corporation
-AND/s/ Steven R. Pedersen
Deron B. Knoner
KELEHER & MCLEOD, P.A.
PO Box AA
Albuquerque, NM 87103
George C. Summerfield
Joseph A. Grear
Keith A. Vogt
Rolf O. Stadheim
Steven R. Pedersen
STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STC.UNM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?