STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation

Filing 109

ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack re 106 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Discovery Objections Under D.N.M. LR-Civ.26.6 filed by Intel Corporation (yc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STC.UNM, Plaintiff, v. No. 10-CV-1077 RB/WDS INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS UNDER D.N.M. LR-CIV.26.6 This matter having come before the Court on the parties’ Unopposed Joint Motion for Further Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery Objections under D.N.M. LR-Civ. 26.6, and the Court being advised that the Motion is jointly made and unopposed, it is hereby ORDERED that the current forty-five (45) day period under D.N.M. LR-Civ.26.6 is hereby extended for an additional twenty-one (21) days for Intel to move to compel regarding STC’s May 2, 2011 privilege logs and responses to Intel’s discovery requests. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 17 day of June, 2011. ____________________________________ HONORABLE ROBERT C. BRACK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Approved: /s/ Brian L. Ferrall Clifford K. Atkinson Douglas A. Baker Justin D. Rodriguez ATKINSON, THAL & BAKER, P.C. Robert A. Van Nest Brian L. Ferrall KEKER & VAN NEST LLP Chad S. Campbell Jonathan M. James Timothy J. Franks Mark E. Strickland Jonathan L. McFarland PERKINS COIE LLP Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation -AND/s/ Steven R. Pedersen Deron B. Knoner KELEHER & MCLEOD, P.A. PO Box AA Albuquerque, NM 87103 George C. Summerfield Joseph A. Grear Keith A. Vogt Rolf O. Stadheim Steven R. Pedersen STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD. Attorneys for Plaintiff STC.UNM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?