STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation

Filing 140

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Magistrate Judge W. Daniel Schneider re 45 MOTION to Dismiss Intel's Amended Counterclaim and Strike Intel's Affirmative Defense for Unenforceability filed by STC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit: timeline(sco)

Case 1:10-cv-01077-RB-WDS Document 51-1

Filed 03/14/11 Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX A: CHRONOLOGY OF INEQUITABLE CONDUCT

STC learns of ’258 patent
(2008)
Brueck/Zaidi Article
(May/June 1993)

1993

1994

’258 patent issued
(6-4-1996)

’258 app. filed
(4-29-94)

1995

1996

1997

1998

’998 app. filed
(9-17-1997)

’321 app. filed*
(9-30-1993)

’321 patent
issued 6-6-1998)

*The ’321 patent issued from an application filed June 6, 1995, but claims
priority to an application filed in September 1993.

548470.01

1999

Inventors’
arguments
distinguishing
’998 from ’321

2000

2008

’998 patent issued
(3-28-2000)

STC requests Cert. of
Corr. (10-22-2008)