STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation

Filing 17

NOTICE by Intel Corporation of Appearance of Robert A. Van Nest and Certificate of Good Standing (Baker, Douglas)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STC.UNM, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING COMES NOW, Robert A. Van Nest, and enters his appearance on behalf of Defendant Intel Corporation, in the afore-captioned matter as follows: Robert A. Van Nest Keker & Van Nest, LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 391-5400 (415) 397-7188 (fax) Douglas A. Baker, a member of the Federal Bar, pursuant to LR-CV 83.3 hereby certifies that Robert A. Van Nest, a non-member attorney, is a member is good standing of the State Bar of California. Respectfully submitted, ATKINSON, THAL & BAKER, P.C. Electronically filed Clifford K. Atkinson Douglas A. Baker Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation 201 Third St. NW, Suite 1850 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 Telephone: (505) 764-8111 Facsimile: (505) 764-8374 CV-2010-1077 RB/WDS Robert A.Van Nest Brian L. Ferrall Paven Malhotra Benedict Y. Hur KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Chad S. Campbell Jonathan M. James Timothy J. Franks Mark E. Strickland PERKINS COIE LLP 2901 N. Central Avenue Suite 2000 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2788 Telephone: (602) 351-8390 Facsimile: (602) 648-7168 Jonathan L. McFarland PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue Suite 4800 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: (206) 359-8000 Facsimile: (206) 359-9000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that on the 22nd day of December, 2010, the foregoing was filed electronically through the CM/ECF system, which caused all parties or counsel to be served by electronic means. Electronically filed Douglas A. Baker 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?