STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation

Filing 186

NOTICE of Briefing Complete by STC. UNM re 169 MOTION to Strike 162 Answer to Counterclaim,,,,,, Answer to Complaint,,,,, - Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Intel's Affirmative Defense Nos. 1, 3, 6, 9 & 10 and to Dismiss Intel's Second Counterclaim MOTION to Strike 162 Answer to Counterclaim,,,,,, Answer to Complaint,,,,, - Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Intel's Affirmative Defense Nos. 1, 3, 6, 9 & 10 and to Dismiss Intel's Second Counterclaim filed by STC. UNM (Pedersen, Steven)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STC.UNM, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 10-CV-01077-RB-WDS INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. STC.UNM’S NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF BRIEFING Pursuant to L.R. 7.4(e), STC.UNM provides notice of the completion of briefing for its Motion to Strike Intel’s Affirmative Defense Nos. 1, 3, 6, 9 & 10 and to Dismiss Intel’s Second Counterclaim and certifies the motion is ready for decision. The following represents the related filings: STC.UNM’s Motion Intel’s Response STC.UNM’s Reply Doc. 169 – January 4, 2012 Doc. 175 & 176 – January 18, 2012 Doc. 185 – February 1, 2012 1 Dated: February 1, 2012 Respectfully submitted, Deron B. Knoner KELEHER & MCLEOD, P.A. 201 Third Street NW, 12th Floor PO Box AA Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 (505) 346-4646 /s/ Steven R. Pedersen Rolf O. Stadheim Joseph A. Grear George C. Summerfield Keith A. Vogt Steven R. Pedersen STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD. 400 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2200 Chicago, Illinois 60611 (312) 755-4400 Attorneys for Plaintiff STC.UNM Certificate of Service: I hereby certify that on February 1, 2012, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing via electronic mail to all counsel of record. /s/ Steven R. Pedersen Steven R. Pedersen STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?