STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation

Filing 233

NOTICE by STC. UNM NOTICE OF AGREED UPON EXTENSION PURSUANT TO D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.4(a) (Vogt, Keith)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STC.UNM, Plaintiff, Civil No. 1:10-cv-01077-RB-WDS v. INTEL CORPORATION Defendant. NOTICE OF AGREED UPON EXTENSION PURSUANT TO D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.4(a) Plaintiff STC.UNM, pursuant to D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.4(a), hereby provides notice of the agreed upon extension of time for filing STC.UNM’s Reply in support of its Rule 19 Motion [Doc. No. 218]. The parties have jointly agreed that STC.UNM’s Reply shall now be filed on or before August 3, 2012. WHEREFORE, pursuant to D.N.M.LR.-Civ. 7.4(a), notice is hereby given that STC.UNM’s Reply in support of its Rule 19 Motion [Doc. No. 218] shall be filed on August 3, 2012. 1 Dated: July 27, 2012 Respectfully submitted, Deron B. Knoner KELEHER & MCLEOD, P.A. 201 Third Street NW, 12th Floor PO Box AA Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 (505) 346-4646 /s/ Keith A. Vogt Rolf O. Stadheim Joseph A. Grear George C. Summerfield Keith A. Vogt Steven R. Pedersen STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD. 400 N. Michigan Ave., Ste. 2200 Chicago, Illinois 60611 (312) 755-4400 Raúl A. Carrillo Jr. CARILLO LAW FIRM, P.C. 937 East Lohman Las Cruces, New Mexico 88001 (575) 647-3200 Attorneys for Plaintiff STC.UNM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that on the 27th day of July, 2012 the foregoing was filed electronically through the CM/ECF system, which caused all parties or counsel to be served by electronic means. In addition, I have caused a copy to be sent to the following parties via email: Kevin W. Bieg, Senior Attorney Sandia National Laboratories Org. 11500, MS0161 P.O. Box 5800 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 kwbieg@sandia.gov Louis G. Stelzner Stelzner, Winter, Warburton, Flores, Sanchez & Dawes, P.A. 302 8th Street NW, Suite 200 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 s@stelznerlaw.com /s/ Keith A. Vogt Keith A. Vogt 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?