STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation
Filing
234
NOTICE by Intel Corporation re 230 Response in Opposition to Motion Notice of Agreed Upon Extension Pursuant to D.N.M. LR-Civ. 7.4(a) (Rodriguez, Justin)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
STC.UNM,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 1:10-cv-01077-RB-WDS
INTEL CORPORATION,
Defendant.
NOTICE OF AGREED UPON EXTENSION
PURSUANT TO D.N.M. LR-Civ. 7.4(a)
Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”), pursuant to D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.4(a), hereby
provides notice of the agreed-upon extension of time for filing Intel’s Reply to STC.UNM’s
Response to Intel’s Cross-Motion to Dismiss STC’s Remaining Claims for Lack of Standing
[Doc. No. 230]. The current deadline, under the rules, for filing Intel’s Reply is Tuesday,
August 7, 2012. The parties have jointly agreed to extend that deadline by ten (10) days. Intel’s
Reply shall now be filed on or before August 17, 2012.
WHEREFORE, pursuant to D.N.M.LR.-Civ. 7.4(a), notice is hereby given that Intel’s
Reply to STC.UNM’s Response to Intel’s Cross-Motion to Dismiss STC’s Remaining Claims for
Lack of Standing [Doc. No. 230] shall be filed on or before August 17, 2012.
Respectfully submitted,
ATKINSON, THAL & BAKER, P.C.
/s/ Justin D. Rodriguez
Douglas A. Baker
Clifford K. Atkinson
Justin D. Rodriguez
201 Third Street NW, Suite 1850
Albuquerque, NM 87102
Tel (505) 764-8111
Robert A. Van Nest
Brian L. Ferrall
Paven Malhotra
Benedict Y. Hur
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
Chad S. Campbell
Jonathan M. James
Timothy J. Franks
Mark E. Strickland
Jonathan L. McFarland
PERKINS COIE LLP
Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on July 27, 2012, the foregoing Notice was
electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send
notification of such filing to all counsel of record.
ATKINSON, THAL & BAKER, P.C.
/s/ Justin D. Rodriguez
Justin D. Rodriguez
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?