STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation
Filing
239
MOTION for Leave to File Surreply by Sandia Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (proposed surreply))(Dawes, Jaime)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
STC.UNM,
Plaintiff,
vs.
No. 10-CV-01077-RB-WDS
INTEL CORPORATION,
Defendant.
SANDIA CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY
COMES NOW Sandia Corporation (Sandia), by and through its attorneys, Stelzner,
Winter, Warburton, Flores, Sanchez & Dawes, P.A., and moves for leave to file a limited
surreply to STC.UNM (STC)’s Reply in Support of its Rule 19 Motion to Correct Standing and
Request for Reconsideration. As grounds for this motion, Sandia states:
1.
STC filed its Rule 19 Motion to Correct Standing and Request for Reconsideration on
June 14, 2012.
2. Although Sandia is not a party to this proceeding it responded to STC’s Rule 19 Motion
because the Motion affects Sandia’s interests in not being joined in this matter.
3. STC filed its Reply in Support of its Motion to Correct Standing and Request for
Reconsideration on August 3, 2012.
4. In its Reply, STC makes certain inaccurate representations.
5. Sandia would like to file a surreply for the limited purpose of correcting those
representations.
WHEREFORE, Sandia respectfully requests that the Court grant it leave to file the surreply
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
1
Dated: August 15, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
STELZNER, WINTER, WARBURTON,
FLORES, SANCHEZ & DAWES, P.A.
/s/ Jaime L. Dawes___________
Luis G. Stelzner
Jaime L. Dawes
P.O. Box 528
Albuquerque, NM 87103
(505) 938-7770
Attorneys for Sandia Corporation
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on August 15, 2012, the foregoing document was
electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will
automatically send notification of such filing to all counsel who have entered an appearance in
this action.
/s/ Jaime L. Dawes____
Luis G. Stelzner
Jaime L. Dawes
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?