STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation

Filing 53

ORDER by Magistrate Judge W. Daniel Schneider granting 52 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Discovery Motions (sco)

Download PDF
STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation Doc. 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STC.UNM, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS UNDER D.N.M. LR-CIV.26.6 CV-2010-1077 RB/WDS This matter having come before the Court on the parties' Unopposed Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery Objections under D.N.M. LR-Civ. 26.6, and the Court being advised that the Motion is jointly made and unopposed, it is hereby ORDERED that the twenty-one (21) day period under D.N.M. LR-Civ.26.6 is hereby extended to forty-five (45) days for all discovery objections served in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 21st day of March, 2011. ____________________________________ HONORABLE W. DANIEL SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Approved: /s/ Clifford K. Atkinson Clifford K. Atkinson Douglas A. Baker Justin D. Rodriguez ATKINSON, THAL & BAKER, P.C. Robert A. Van nest Brian L. Ferrall KEKER & VAN NEST LLP Chad S. Campbell Jonathan M. James Timothy J. Franks Mark E. Strickland Jonathan L. McFarland PERKINS COIE LLP Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation -AND/s/ Steven R. Pedersen Deron B. Knoner KELEHER & MCLEOD, P.A. PO Box AA Albuquerque, NM 87103 George C. Summerfield Joseph A. Grear Keith A. Vogt Rolf O. Stadheim Steven R. Pedersen STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD. Attorneys for Plaintiff STC.UNM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?