STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STC. UNM for Its SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO INTEL'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 1, 2, 4-7, 10, 11, 13-16, 20-23, & 26-28) (Pedersen, Steven)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STC.UNM, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION Defendant. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR STC'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO INTEL'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 1, 2, 4-7, 10, 11, 13-16, 20-23, & 26-28) Civil No. 1:10-cv-01077-RB-WDS
I hereby certify that on April 1, 2011, I caused a copy of STC'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO INTEL'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 1, 2, 4-7, 10, 11, 13-16, 20-23, & 26-28), along with this Certificate of Service, to be served upon the following individuals as indicated below. VIA Email (Per Service Agreement) Brian L. Ferrall KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 391-5400 /s/ Steven R. Pedersen STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD. 400 N. Michigan Ave., Ste. 2200 Chicago, Illinois 60611 (312) 755-4400 Certificate of Service: I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 1st day of April, 2011, I filed the foregoing Certificate of Service electronically through the CM/ECF system, which caused the following counsel for Defendant, Intel, Corp. to be served by electronic means, as more fully reflected on the Notice of Electronic Filing: Clifford K. Atkinson (email@example.com); Douglas A. Baker (firstname.lastname@example.org); Robert A Van Nest (email@example.com);
Brian L Ferrall (firstname.lastname@example.org); Paven Malhotra (email@example.com); Benedict Y Hur (firstname.lastname@example.org); Jonathan M. James (JJames@perkinscoie.com); Chad S Campbell (CSCampbell@perkinscoie.com); Timothy J Franks (TFranks@perkinscoie.com); Mark E Strickland (MStrickland@perkinscoie.com); and Jonathan L McFarland (JMcFarland@perkinscoie.com). /s/ Steven R. Pedersen Attorney for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?