STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation

Filing 76

RESPONSE in Opposition re 67 MOTION to Amend/Correct 63 Order on Motion for Protective Order filed by STC. UNM. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Pedersen, Steven)

Download PDF
Exhibit A DECLARATION OF STEVEN R. PEDERSEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STC.UNM, Plaintiff, v. CV-2010-1077 RB/WDS INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. DECLARATION OF STEVEN R. PEDERSEN I, Steve Pedersen, declare under penalty of perjury as follows: 1. I am counsel of record for STC in the above-captioned matter. 2. Prior to filing this suit against Intel, STC enforced the same patent against Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Company at the U.S. Int’l Trade Commission. 3. In that proceeding Intel’s current counsel, Keker and Van Nest, represented TSMC. 4. The parties to that case agreed to similar provisions for the inspection of the GDS files, e.g., on a stand-alone computer at a secure site, etc. 5. Both Samsung and TSMC agreed that Dr. Mack could retain a second copy of the key technical documents in his home office. 6. In order to satisfy Samsung’s and TSMC’s sensitivities, Dr. Mack procured a safe which he used to store the documents. Date: April 18, 2011 /s/ Steven R. Pedersen  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?