STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation

Filing 83

NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Intel Corporation re 67 MOTION to Amend/Correct 63 Order on Motion for Protective Order filed by Intel Corporation (Rodriguez, Justin)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STC.UNM, Civil No. 1:10-cv-01077-RB-WDS Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF BRIEFING ON INTEL CORPPORATION’S MOTION TO AMEND THE INTERIM PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF [DOC. NO. 67] Defendant Intel Corporation, by and through its counsel of record, Atkinson, Thal & Baker, P.C., hereby gives notice to the Court pursuant to D.N.M. LR-Civ.7.4(e) that briefing on the following Motion is complete and that the Motion is ready for decision. 1. Intel Corporation’s Motion to Amend the Interim Protective Order and Memorandum in Support Thereof [Doc. No. 67] filed April 5, 2011; 2. STC’s Opposition to Amending the Protective Order [Doc. No. 76] filed April 18, 2011; and 3. Defendant Intel Corporation’s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Amend the Interim Protective Order [Doc. No. 82] filed April 26, 2011. Respectfully submitted, A TKINSON , T HAL & B AKER , P . C . /s/ Justin D. Rodriguez Douglas A. Baker Clifford K. Atkinson Justin D. Rodriguez 201 Third Street, N.W., Suite 1850 Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 764-8111 Robert A. Van Nest Brian L. Ferrall K EKER & V AN N EST LLP Chad S. Campbell Timothy J. Franks P ERKINS C OIE LLP Attorneys for Intel Corporation CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on April 26, 2011, the foregoing document was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification of such filing to all counsel who have entered an appearance in this action. A TKINSON , T HAL & B AKER , P . C . /s/ Justin D. Rodriguez Clifford K. Atkinson 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?