Welch v. City of Albuquerque et al
Filing
268
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO SOME INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
TERYSA M. WELCH,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Civ. No. 11-700 KG/SCY
CITY OF ALBQUERQUE, a New Mexico
Municipality; RAYMOND SCHULTZ,
ELIZABETH PAIZ, WILLIAM ROSEMAN, JOSEPH
HUDSON, DAVID HUBBARD, ROBERT SMITH,
CECIL KNOX, J. R. POTTER, KEVIN GAGNE, SUE
NEAL, and JOHN DOES I-V, Individually and as
agents and employees of the City of Albuquerque,
Defendants.
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO
SOME INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
Having granted in part and denied in part Individual Defendants [sic] Motion for
Summary Judgment Addressing Counts I, III, and IV and Memorandum in Support Thereof
(Doc. 232) by entering a Memorandum Opinion and Order contemporaneously with this Partial
Summary Judgment as to Some Individual Defendants,
IT IS ORDERED that
1. summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Joseph Hudson, David Hubbard,
Robert Smith, J.R. Potter, and Kevin Gagne as to the Counts IV claims of the Second Amended
Complaint (Doc. 88) which arise from the August 24, 2009, Charge of Discrimination;
2. summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Raymond Schultz, Hudson,
Hubbard, Smith, Potter, and Gagne as to the Count IV claims of the Second Amended Complaint
(Doc. 88) which arise from the March 9, 2011, Charge of Discrimination; and
3. those Count IV claims are dismissed without prejudice.
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?