Welch v. City of Albuquerque et al

Filing 268

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO SOME INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO TERYSA M. WELCH, Plaintiff, vs. Civ. No. 11-700 KG/SCY CITY OF ALBQUERQUE, a New Mexico Municipality; RAYMOND SCHULTZ, ELIZABETH PAIZ, WILLIAM ROSEMAN, JOSEPH HUDSON, DAVID HUBBARD, ROBERT SMITH, CECIL KNOX, J. R. POTTER, KEVIN GAGNE, SUE NEAL, and JOHN DOES I-V, Individually and as agents and employees of the City of Albuquerque, Defendants. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO SOME INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS Having granted in part and denied in part Individual Defendants [sic] Motion for Summary Judgment Addressing Counts I, III, and IV and Memorandum in Support Thereof (Doc. 232) by entering a Memorandum Opinion and Order contemporaneously with this Partial Summary Judgment as to Some Individual Defendants, IT IS ORDERED that 1. summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Joseph Hudson, David Hubbard, Robert Smith, J.R. Potter, and Kevin Gagne as to the Counts IV claims of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 88) which arise from the August 24, 2009, Charge of Discrimination; 2. summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Raymond Schultz, Hudson, Hubbard, Smith, Potter, and Gagne as to the Count IV claims of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 88) which arise from the March 9, 2011, Charge of Discrimination; and 3. those Count IV claims are dismissed without prejudice. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?