Sarrett et al v. Cordova et al
Filing
94
ORDER OF REFERENCE by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales referring 91 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Partially Denying the Motion to Dismiss Filed On Behalf of the Los Lunas and Bosque Farms Defendants; and 92 County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution to Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. (tah)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
MARK SANCHEZ AND PATRICK MARQUEZ,
On Behalf Of Themselves and a Class Of
Similarly Situated Individuals,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Civ. No. 11-1021 KG/SCY
DEREK WILLIAMS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER OF REFERENCE
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach
Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990), this matter is referred to
Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary
hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommended to the Court an ultimate
disposition of the Motion for Reconsideration of Order Partially Denying the Motion to Dismiss
Filed On Behalf of the Los Lunas and Bosque Farms Defendants (Doc. 91), and County
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (Doc. 92). The Magistrate Judge will
submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the
District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties will be given
the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a
cop of the proposed disposition.
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?