HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. v. Martinez et al
Filing
159
JUDGMENT AND ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 149 Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Amounts; awarding Plaintiff a judgment in the amount of $445,248.51; awarding Plaintiff attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $34,256.51; and allowing the Martinezes to inspect the Note at issue no later than 10/31/2017. (tah)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
VOLT ASSET HOLDINGS TRUST XVI,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Civ. No. 13-508 KG/KK
MARIE A. MARTINEZ A/K/A MARIE
MARTINEZ, FELIX J. MARTINEZ A/K/A
FELIX JOE MARTINEZ, FELIX JOE MARTINEZ
PUBLIC TRUST, and SOUTHWEST FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC.,
Defendants.
JUDGMENT AND ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTER
This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Amounts
(Motion) and Elizabeth Dranntel’s Affidavit of Attorney Fees and Costs (Affidavit), both filed
on July 7, 2017. (Docs. 149 and 150). Defendants Marie A. Martinez a/k/a Marie Martinez and
Felix J. Martinez a/k/a Felix Joe Martinez (collectively, the Martinezes) filed a response on July
30, 2017, and Plaintiff filed a reply on August 10, 2017. (Docs. 156 and 157). Having reviewed
the Motion, the Affidavit, and the accompanying briefs, the Court grants the Motion.
Plaintiff seeks an order awarding $445,248.51, the total amount owed on the Note
(including interest, tax, and costs) at issue in this foreclosure action as of June 18, 2017, and
$34,256.51, the amount of attorney’s fees and costs incurred in litigating this lawsuit. Plaintiff
also requests that the Court appoint Jennifer A. Taylor as Special Master to hold the foreclosure
sale of the property.
In response to the Motion, the Martinezes apparently argue that the Court should
reconsider its March 1, 2017, Memorandum Opinion and Order in which it granted summary
judgment in favor of Plaintiff. See (Doc. 140). Because the Martinezes made their request to
reconsider more than 28 days after the Court entered its Memorandum Opinion and Order, the
Court construes the request to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (providing for motion for
relief from judgment). Cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (“A motion to alter or amend a judgment must
be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment.”). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
Rule 60(c)(1) states that a Rule 60(b) motion “must be made within a reasonable time….” A
reasonable time is dependent upon whether the movant has provided “sufficient justification for
the delay.” Sorbo v. United Parcel Serv., 432 F.3d 1169, 1178 (10th Cir. 2005). Here, the
Martinezes waited almost five months to request reconsideration and did not provide any reason
for such a delay. The Court determines that the Martinezes’ request for reconsideration was not
made within a reasonable time. For that reason, the Court denies the request for reconsideration.
The Martinezes do not otherwise object to the amount of the awards Plaintiff seeks.
Independent of the absence of an objection, and having reviewed the Affidavit, the Court finds
that the request for attorney’s fees and costs is reasonable. The Martinezes also do not object to
Plaintiff’s proposed Special Master, Jennifer A. Taylor.
The Martinezes, however, “[r]equest that the court order the sequestering of the alleged
note until the Debt is satisfied, and if the Plaintiff refuses Martinez [sic] request that the Court
order Plaintiff to allow Martinezes to inspect the alleged Note at Plaintiffs [sic] office.” (Doc.
156) at 9. Plaintiff did not respond to this request. Finding no prejudice to Plaintiff, the Court
will order that Plaintiff’s attorney allow the Martinezes to inspect the Note at her office.
For the foregoing reasons, the Court ORDERS that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Amounts (Doc. 149) is granted;
2. the Martinezes’ request for reconsideration is denied as untimely;
2
3. Plaintiff is awarded a judgment in the amount of $445,248.51;
4. Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $34,256.51; and
5. Plaintiff’s attorney shall allow the Martinezes to inspect the Note at issue at Plaintiff’s
attorney’s office at a time convenient to the parties, but no later than October 31, 2017.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
1. the Property at issue in this lawsuit is ordered to be sold and that Jennifer A. Taylor,
Ancillary Legal Support, Inc., is appointed Special Master to advertise and sell the Property and
make a report thereof to this Court as provided by law;
2. in the event that the Special Master is unable to conduct the sale when scheduled, the
Special Master may designate a successor to act as Special Master, without further notice or
order, and said successor shall conduct the sale, notice of which may have been published in the
name of the original Special Master;
3. the Special Master is empowered to postpone the date and time of sale in the event the
Special Master deems such postponement advisable, and may sell the Property at such postponed
sale on the terms set forth herein. Postponement of the sale of the Property may be effected by
the Special Master appearing and announcing the new time, date, and place of sale to all persons
attending at the time, date, and place originally published for the sale. In the event of a
postponement, a notice of said postponement, including the time, date, and place of the
rescheduled sale shall be filed with the court and served in the same manner and upon the same
persons or entities as were served with the original Notice of Sale. No additional publication or
notice of the postponed sale shall be required;
4. the Property shall be sold to the highest bidder for cash, free and clear of all liens or
rights of Defendants Marie and Felix Martinez save any right of redemption, and of any persons
3
claiming under and through them, or any persons claiming an interest by an instrument filed for
record after the date of filing of the Notice of Lis Pendens in connection with this action, but
subject to any unpaid taxes or liens or interests not foreclosed herein;
5. at said sale any party may, and hereby is authorized to, bid in the amount of
its judgment or any portion thereof at the foreclosure sale as the equivalent of cash, provided,
however, that if any party other than Plaintiff is the successful bidder, the bid must include cash
to the extent necessary to pay the Special Master’s fee, all costs and expenses of the foreclosure
sale, and the amount of Plaintiff’s judgment;
6. the proceeds of said sale shall first apply to the costs of sale, including
Special Master’s fee, to be hereafter fixed by the Court, for any costs incurred for the
maintenance and protection of the property, and then to Plaintiff for application to Plaintiff’s
judgment amount, interest through the date of sale, and Plaintiff’s reasonable attorney’s fees and
any other costs. If the proceeds of the sale are greater than the amount due Plaintiff as set forth
above, the excess will deposited into the Court Registry and applied as determined by the Court.
If the proceeds of the sale are insufficient to pay such amounts, the Court reserves jurisdiction to
render a deficiency judgment against Defendants Marie and Feliz Martinez;
7. unless the Property to be sold is permitted to be, and is in fact, redeemed as
provided by law, which redemption period is 30 days, all persons claiming under, through or
against the Borrower or any other named Defendant by instruments recorded subsequent to the
Notice of Lis Pendens, shall be forever foreclosed from any and all right, title and interest in or
lien or claim upon, or equity or redemption to the property;
8. this Court retains jurisdiction over this proceeding and the parties hereto so
as to enter such further orders as may be appropriate upon the submission of the Special Master’s
4
Report, to assess such additional costs for the Special Master, attorney’s fees and interest as may
be appropriate;
9. if any persons occupying the Property shall fail or refuse to vacate and quit
possession of the Property after the sale, the purchaser thereof may request from this Court an
Order of Forcible Entry and Detainer directing the United States Marshal, the Bernalillo County
Sheriff, or any other law enforcement agency with jurisdiction to place the purchaser in
possession of the Property; and
10. if personal property remains on the real property after entry of the order approving
the sale in this matter, the personal property is deemed abandoned and the purchaser may dispose
of the property in any manner pursuant to applicable law.
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?