Bevan v. Santa Fe County et al
Filing
375
ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying 259 Motion in Limine; granting in part 261 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 262 Motion in Limine; granting in part 266 M otion in Limine; granting in part 267 Motion in Limine; granting in part 274 Motion in Limine; denying 275 Motion in Limine; denying 276 Motion in Limine; granting in part 279 Motion in Limine; denying 281 Motion in Limine; granting 282 Motion in Limine; granting in part 293 Motion to Clarify. (tah)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
AIMEE BEVAN, as Personal Representative
of the Estate of Desiree Gonzales, deceased,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Civ. No. 15-0073 KG/SCY
GABRIEL VALENCIA, Youth Development
Admin., Individually; MATTHEW EDMUNDS,
Corrections Officer, Individually; JOHN
ORTEGA, Corrections Officer, Individually;
MOLLY ARCHULETA, Corrections Nurse,
Individually; ST. VINCENT HOSPITAL; and
NATHAN PAUL UNKEFER, M.D.,
Defendants.
ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT
On August 29, 2018, the Court heard argument on numerous motions in limine, some of
which the Court took under advisement. See (Doc.370). Lee Hunt represented Plaintiff at the
hearing while Mark Komer represented County Defendants, Steven Gonzales represented
Defendant Molly Archuleta, and Thomas Mack and Jason Yamato represented Defendant Nathan
Paul Unkefer, M.D.
Having reviewed the motions in limine which the Court took under advisement, the
responses to those motions, the argument of counsel at the August 29, 2018, hearing, the Court
ORDERS as follows:
1.
Nathan Unkefer, M.D.'s Motion In Limine to Bar Questions to Dr. Unkefer
Regarding Learning Treatises (Doc. 259), filed July 10, 2018, is denied without
prejudice to raising the motion at trial;
2.
(a) Nathan Paul Unkefer M.D.'s Motion in Limine to Bar Testimony Interpreting
Video Surveillance (Doc. 261), filed July 10, 2018;
(b) St. Vincent’s Motion in Limine to Bar Testimony Regarding Video
Surveillance (Doc. 266), filed July 10, 2018; and
(c) County Individual’s Motion in Limine Concerning Expert Testimony About
Video Evidence (Doc. 279), filed July 13, 2018.
The Court grants, in part, these three motions to the extent that Plaintiff cannot
elicit expert testimony interpreting or explaining the surveillance video while
simultaneously playing the surveillance video. Plaintiff’s experts, however, can
testify as to whether they viewed the surveillance video and to what in the
surveillance video informed their expert opinions. The Court further denies the
motions without prejudice to raising these motions at trial as they may relate to
lay opinion testimony under Fed. R. Evid. 701(b).
3.
Defendant St. Vincent Hospital’s Motion in Limine Regarding Discrete Trial
Evidentiary Issues (Doc. 262), filed July 10, 2018.
The Court has already granted the motion as to references to the “conscience of
the community.” To the extent necessary, the Court denies the remainder of the
motion without prejudice to raising the motion at trial.
4.
Defendant St. Vincent Hospital’s Motion In Limine to Exclude Testimony
Concerning Other Providers and Subsequent Admission (Doc. 267), filed July 10,
2018, is granted, in part, in that Plaintiff may only elicit testimony and other
evidence relevant to the claims against Defendant Unkefer arising from Desiree
Gonzales’ second admission to St. Vincent Hospital on May 8, 2014.
5.
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding
Desiree Gonzales’s Parents' Actions After Her Death (Doc. 274), filed July 13,
2018, is granted, in part, as follows:
First, only Janel Gonzales may testify regarding the agreement to divide the
proceeds from this lawsuit, if she has personal knowledge of the agreement.
Second, testimony and evidence related to the state personal representative
litigation is excluded.
Third, social media posts made after Desiree Gonzales’ death are excluded.
Fourth, as to Plaintiff’s request to exclude evidence of Waldo Anaya’s actions
regarding the GoFundMe fund, the Court denies that part of the motion without
prejudice to raising it at trial.
6.
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Identification of Beneficiaries (Doc. 281),
filed July 13, 2018, is denied.
2
7.
Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Limit the Testimony of Gary M. Vilke, M.D. (Doc.
275), filed July 13, 2018, is denied without prejudice to raising the motion at trial.
8.
Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Defendant Nathan Paul Unkefer's
Testimony on Cause of Death (Doc. 276), filed July 13, 2018, is denied without
prejudice to raising the motion at trial.
9.
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding
Desiree Gonzales’s Alleged Sexual Abuse and CYFD Allegations (Doc. 282),
filed July 15, 2018.
The Court already excluded references to sexual abuse and now excludes
references to CYFD allegations. See (Doc. 370).
10.
County Individual’s Motion for Clarification Concerning Cheryl Wills, M.D.
(Doc. 293), filed August 1, 2018, is granted, in part, in that Wills may testify as a
summary witness as follows:
a. Wills’ summary testimony is limited to the two years preceding Desiree
Gonzales’ death;
b. Wills cannot reference sexual abuse or CYFD allegations and determinations;
c. Wills may testify only about Desiree Gonzales’ substance abuse history, places
of residence, and school attendance history; and
d. Wills may testify about Desiree Gonzales’s arrest history, specifically arrest
dates, alleged and adjudicated delinquencies, and resulting custodial and
probationary sentences.
The Court reserves judgment on the admissibility of Wills’ testimony, which is
subject to proper authentication and admissibility under the Federal Rules of
Evidence.
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?