Latham v. Corizon Health Services
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 111 and denying 92 Motion to Amend/Correct by Chief Judge M. Christina Armijo. (vv)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
FRANK L. LATHAM,
No. CV 15-00242-MCA-CG
CORIZON, LLC, et al.,
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings
and Recommended Disposition (“PFRD”), filed on October 24, 2016. (Doc. 111). In the
PFRD, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint,
(Doc. 92), be denied because Plaintiff fails to state a claim in the proposed amendments.
The parties were notified that written objections to the PFRD were due within fourteen
days. (Doc. 111 at 10). No objections have been filed, and the deadline of November 7,
2016, has passed. The recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are adopted by this
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint,
(Doc. 92), is DENIED.
THE HONORABLE M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?