Moreno v. GEO Group et al.

Filing 38

STIPULATED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 37 Defendant Corizon's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer 34 Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. (am)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JESUS MORENO, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 1:16-CV-00013 JCH/SMV GEO GROUP, CORIZON INC., and DR. MARK WALDEN, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Defendant Corizon’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File and Answer to Second Amended Complaint, and the Court having reviewed the pleading FINDS: 1. The motion is unopposed; 2. The motion is well-taken and should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: A. The due date for Corizon to file its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint shall be extended pending the Court’s ruling on Corizon’s Amended Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. B. Should the Court deny the motion for reconsideration, Corizon’s Answer to the Second Amended Complaint shall be due no later than ten (10) days after entry of the Court’s order. _______________________________ STEPHAN M. VIDMAR United States Magistrate Judge APPROVED: ALLEN LAW FIRM, LLC Michelle Lalley Blake Michelle Lalley Blake Attorneys for Defendant Corizon, LLC 6121 Indian School Rd, Ste 230 Albuquerque, NM 87110 (505) 298-9400 ADAMS+CROW LAW FIRM /s/ Electronic Approval 10/11/17 Samantha M. Adams Alana M. De Young Attorneys for Plaintiff 5051 Journal Center Blvd. NE Suite 320 Albuquerque, NM 87109 (505) 582-2819 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?