CalMat Co. v. Old Castle Precast, Inc. et al
Filing
145
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales striking 137 Objections; striking 138 Motion to Clarify; striking 139 Motion to Clarify; striking 140 Motion to Clarify; striking 141 Motion for Order; and striking 142 Motion to Set Aside. (tah)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
CALMAT CO.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Civ. No. 16-26 KG/WPL
OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER STRIKING FILINGS (DOCS. 137 THROUGH 142)
This matter comes before the Court upon the following objections and motions filed by
Rune Kraft on behalf of Kraft Americas Holdings, Incorporated (KAHI): (Docs. 137 through
142). The Court has repeatedly instructed Rune Kraft that KAHI cannot participate in this
lawsuit without first obtaining legal counsel and that Rune Kraft, as a non-attorney, cannot file
legal documents on behalf of KAHI. See (Docs. 14, 56, 89, 114, 126, and 132). See also
D.N.M. LR-Cv 83.7 (corporation “must be represented by an attorney authorized to practice
before this Court.”); D.N.M. LR-Cv 83.8(c) (corporation “can only appear with an attorney” and,
absent entry of appearance by an attorney, filings by corporation “may be stricken and default
judgment or other sanctions imposed.”). Rune Kraft’s continued refusal to follow the Court’s
orders regarding KAHI’s need to obtain licensed legal counsel and his continued insistence on
filing documents on KAHI’s behalf do not bode well for Rune Kraft and will significantly bear
on whether the Court imposes sanctions at the June 29, 2017, show cause hearing. In the
meantime, for the foregoing reasons, (Docs. 137 through 142) are STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?